Some university professors let their students choose their research topic themselves. Some do not. Which one do you think is better. Why?
The combination of interest and effort leads to the luminous results. Universities always have been places for intellectual nourishment, and they have been established to promote science and individuals’ innovative faculty. According to some psychologists, individuals make their best efforts in the fields they have a predisposition to. But the other point here is whether students’ predilection for the research field is profitable for science world or not. An ineluctable query which always has been the topic of contention and brought about heated debates is whether professors should let their students choose their research topic themselves or not. From my vantage point, students should work on their research interest. In what follows, I will elaborate on my perspective.
First of all, it is significant to be mentioned that universities are the last step of students to initiate their occupational life, and it is a very cardinal period of time to procure and establish their self-esteem and autonomy. It is very momentous value for universities to nurture students who are innovative and mentally open. If professors let the students choose their research field according to their interest, it would benefit students and society in manifold ways. For instance, the student will attend his research very diligently and he would experience mental flow which is a satisfaction in doing an interesting activity during which you do are not cognizant of time passage. The result of such hard and ginger work would be very successful and will lead to great scientific results. This student will have a very proper self-esteem because he could flower his potential abilities and he will be a profitable person to his society too.
Another reason which deserves some attention is that professors would benefit in this way too. For instance, if professors accede to their student's research field, they will be familiar with new fields they have not tried. So in this way, they could extend more their sweeping knowledge and maybe find something new in the terra incognita. Furthermore, the success of their students would benefit them in another way too. If their students are successful, their academic rate will rise and they will win their students’ acclaim which is the most precious thing for a teacher. This success and approbation will give the teachers the sense of equanimity which is the best experience in life. From my viewpoint, it is the best achievement for teacher and it would be a repose from arduous work they have done to that point.
Reflecting upon all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that it is the best way to let students choose their research field. Students who can accommodate their interest and their efforts will get the best results in their life. They will develop a very integrated personality, especially in occupational settings and this progress will disseminate to other aspects of their life. Their acquired self-esteem and self-government will scatter to their social relations too. So with some meditation, it is obvious that success in the university and life is very dependent on the harmony which students can experience in the university. It can be a very great field of research for scientists to promote students’ future welfare. They can assay students’ sense of freedom in choosing research field and the effects on future development and success in every aspect of students’ life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...as aroused the longstanding controversy as to whether parents should offer their children mon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, while, as to, in brief, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2872.0 1977.66487455 145% => OK
No of words: 571.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02977232925 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84168193013 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451838879159 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 889.2 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7208641505 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.869565217 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8260869565 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95652173913 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135597578779 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451702668554 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415880987152 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686389837749 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470880422393 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.