Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

This has been a controversial debate on whether the government should spend more money in support of arts than is the support of athletics. As far as I am concerned, I agree with this statement, as I believe that art plays a dominant role in society. Arts not only fulfill the mental requirements of people but also can solve many problems in society.
To begin with, people need to fulfill their mental requirements. Nowadays, life is so stressful for people. Regarding their age, people are under big pressure to do their tasks to avoid its consequences. Stress can predispose people to mental and physical diseases. To release their stress people need to spend time in a quiet and stress-free atmosphere. Different types of art exhibition can provide this atmosphere for people. Visiting a painting or sculpture exhibition, visiting museums are exciting for people. Visiting different kinds of arts not only enable them to release their stresses and tiredness but also provides an opportunity for them to appreciate art. When it comes to me, I always like to visit carpet exhibition. Visiting different exhibition departs me from daily routine life. It is so relaxing for me because I can appreciate the beauty of art without thinking about my troubles.
Moreover, the government can solve many problems of society through art. In this case, different types of movies can present social problems. Increasing the awareness of people about social problems can solve many problems. For example, representing a movie about divorce and consequences of divorce on children may cause to decrease of divorce. Besides, people can learn lots of things from movies. For instance, people can become familiar with different cultures and traditions all over the world. Therefore movies can broaden the horizon of people. In my case, watching American movies helped me to improve my linguistic skills which were very useful for me in university.
On the other hand, donating money on art does not mean that the government should decrease the budget of sports teams. As like as art, all sports activities are exciting for people. Sports activities and sports matches can provide health and excitement to people. However, sports teams can find personal sponsors and there is no need for them to earn their money from the government.
In conclusion, I believe that spending money on art is indispensable for the government as funding money would fulfill the mental requirements of people and solve many social problems. However, I cannot deny the importance of sports activities for the community.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
This has been a ontroversial debate whether government ...
^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: decreasing
...quence of divorce on children may cause to decrease of divorce. In addition, people can lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ures and traditions all over the world. Therefore movies can broaden the horizonof people...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15903614458 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80184705683 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506024096386 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7310123201 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4642857143 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8214285714 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138854358309 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377702002518 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666350816536 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1007596036 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827007822063 0.0645574589148 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.