It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all human beings have always been involved in a great struggle to improve the level of creativity and knowledge by watching movies or reading books. Whereas some people debate that for the case when a movie is made based on a specific story in a book, it would be better for all individuals to watch the movie before reading the book, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that this is not a great idea and it is more important to read the book before watching the movie. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To begin with, it is noteworthy to mention that if a person watches a movie, which has been made based on the story of a renowned book, before reading the book, he will definitely know how the end of the book is. However, he will not sure about how different factors have exactly affected the formation of the story. In other words, a movie does not cover all aspects of a book due to its short length in comparison to the book’s length. Consequently, one of the most exquisite and momentous points of reading a book before watching its movie is that spectators can easily comprehend and persuade the structures of the movie. An example can significantly shed some light on this subject. Several years ago, I made a decision to watch the series of Harry Potter movie. In the end, I realized that if I did not read its book before watching the movies, I would have not been able to completely understand the role of several characters in the story. The book strikingly helped me recognize and distinguish some paramount points regarding the characters.
Furthermore, one of most significant matters of watching a movie is that the director’s point of view is really involved in his movie. Under such a circumstance, if an individual does not read the book before watching the movie, the opinion of the director absolutely impacts his perspective toward the movie. Therefore, people cannot discuss their own imagination, consequences as well as assumptions about the characters of the story. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. In the aforementioned example, I am actually sure that if I did not read the story firstly, I would have not enabled to talk about Harry’s characteristic individually. This is because the actors attempted to show his character very kind and enthusiastic person; however, he was definitely an ardent and non-eager person.
In conclusion, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that a person shall read a book before watching its movie on television. This is because he can talk about his own attitude readily without any effects from the actor’s standpoint on it and moreover, he will be able to figure out the movie point by point.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91796875 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96327620369 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47265625 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.0 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.2008928512 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.9 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385451355552 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112077971264 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110128252687 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245217310403 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973968674309 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.002688172 275% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.