It goes without saying that in this progressive world where we live, prosperity and failure of a society heavily relies on decision-making practices. While some people are of the opinion that young people are the pillars of a community and their decisions can drive the society to flourish, others assume that youngsters have no influence on those significant decisions that shed light on the future of the society. Personally speaking, I agree with this statement and the reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is no secret to anyone that young people are not experienced enough in order to make influential decisions which in turn would positively overshadow the future of society. In this line of thought, although the young generation is well-educated and has experienced the vicissitudes of life, their experience pales in comparison to the older generation. Undeniably, being naïve and the absence of experience in understanding how complicated life is, have led the young people to be marginalized. To put it into a more vivid picture, in 2004 Sam Smith, the eighty-year-old candidate won the presidential election with the majority of the poll against thirty-year-old Paul Timberlake. When the journalists asked people about their opinion and the reason they voted for the old candidate, most of them assume that the younger candidate, although seemed to be prospective, could not make important decisions since he has not experienced the ebbs and flows of life. If a person is equipped with a variety of experiences, the way he or she makes a decision can positively affect the future of society.
Furthermore, as we all know young people are not providential and they also live for the moment; in this vein, their decisions are confined to a special time period and cannot contribute to the future of the society. It is crystal clear that one of the salient characteristics of the young is that they are ambitious; however, aspiration does not guarantee the success of a society in future. As an illustration, the so-called scholars of today’s society who are indeed publication-hungry focus on various assortments of problems and difficulties in the society; however, they take the problems to be temporal in nature and the solutions they offer cannot be attributed to the same problems years later. An interesting study was conducted at Arizona State University in 2017, and the findings revealed that young people cannot make influential decisions the way it meant to be. According to the study, a problem was posed to two different groups of people in order to evaluate their decision-making practices. While the young people proposed solutions which could not be used in future, the older people’ decision was to be used in future and every aspect of the problems was also considered. Since younger individuals do not consider the farther future, their decisions cannot be influential either.
In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned reasons into account, I hold the view that young people cannot have an impact on the important decisions of society. Being naïve and inexperienced, and not being providential are among the most conspicuous reasons which have been explained in details.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... not guarantee the success of a society in future. As an illustration, the so-called scho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1082, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...posed solutions which could not be used in future, the older people' decision was to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2770.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24621212121 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14655559275 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479166666667 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 878.4 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9405250893 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.888888889 100.406767564 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220692756396 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779502684017 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522893953086 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158198992143 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047887387993 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.