State whether you agree or disagree with the following statement. To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries of university professors.
Nowadays, is considered by universities a prerequisite to have high standards as sign of prestige, and one of the most crucial issues is that some people believe that colleges should spend more money on professor’s salaries to improve the quality of education, while others argue the opposite. Nevertheless, in my opinion, increasing pay is not a consistent reason to prove a betterment in this topic, because salary is not an effective way when it comes to change the pedagogical strategies or either the method that each teacher works.
To begin with, a higher salary doesn’t mean that a person will be better trained, as quality might not change due to the teacher may feel that they are already doing an excellent job in their own opinion. In some cases, it is true that pay rise would be an incentive to professionals to do their job motivated, but this is an indirect benefit for students, considering that nobody can assure it will result in a positive impact inside classrooms. For example, when I was in my freshman year, I had a teacher who had seriously problems in matters of giving us education. I remember she haven’t the sufficient organization, grammar, or vocation to progress with us. And instead of all, she was very haughty to those around her because of her social and economic position on campus. Evidently, money doesn’t have a direct influence in how teaching it will be.
Secondly, it is a mistake to have professors who lack pedagogical studies, despite their broad knowledge in their field. In universities it is common to have this situation since it is not a requirement to work as a teacher in this kind of institutions. Even though it is important to have doctorates, it is essential to have teachers who can learn different ways of teaching, in such manner they will be able to transmit them experiences and understanding to the class. For example, in my sophomore year I had a teacher that was a specialist on radio, but also, she studied language pedagogic, so in classes she always dedicated time to correct us individually to see our phonetical errors, which no many professors would take this sort of trouble. These changes can inspire student’s enthusiasm towards study and encourage them to have a greater academic performance. Moreover, High qualified professionals can grant wiser suggestions and guide undergraduates in a right direction.
To sum up, I believe universities should focus on more effective methods to improve quality standards instead of spending more money on professor’s salaries. In that way you can create a positive environment and attract more talented people who will increase the prestige of college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 699, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...lly to see our phonetical errors, which no many professors would take this sort of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, sort of, in my opinion, in some cases, it is true, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03820224719 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02608280192 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557303370787 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.0803797228 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.125 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8125 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.45110844103 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172779092019 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579246961268 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943252114447 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141452718345 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103752849365 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.