Students at universities often have a choice of places to live. They may choose to live in university dormitories, or they may choose to live in apartments in the community.
Nowadays, the place of living plays a crucial role for students during their university studies. However, there has been a long-standing discussion whether students should live in an apartment or not. While opponents hold the view that living in an apartment has too many downsides, advocates have the opposite viewpoint. In this regard, I believe that the negative sides of living in apartment overweight the positive ones. In the following essay, I will elaborate both the disadvantages and advantages of living in an apartment, and vice versa.
The first beneficial thing of living in a suit is the fact that students are not distracted by others in the time of the studies. In my opinion, this positive side is very crucial reason for students and it could affect their grades positively. For instance, if students lived alone than they would not be disturbed by their neighbors. As a result, students would be more concentrated and motivated to study in a quiet and peaceful place. Personally, during my studies, after 3 years life in dorm I decided to rent an apartment - the results was astonishing. In the last year of my studies I drastically increased my GPA as a result of live without roommates.
On the other hand, there are also many negative sides of living in an apartment. From my point of view, living in an apartment is very expensive. As a result, many students choose to live in dormitories. Moreover, students would be supposed to pay bills and other residential costs which is not a case in dormitory. Furthermore, students could become very introverted. For example, students who live in dorms usually communicate with their peers in a leisure time or during the parties, which are often maintained for weekends. In addition, students who live in a suit usually do not have chances to interact with others, and that increases the level of depression, aggression and causes many other mental health problems.
In weighing the pros and cons of this topic, I could confidently say that living in an apartment is better way of living throughout the university years. I agree that in this way students could be very isolated, but we should not neglect the facts that students could do different activities not related with the university that could make their life better. As a result, through living in apartment they would have more freedom and concentration which is very important for them, during the educational period.
- Parents are the best teachers. 60
- teachers are less appreciated or valued today rather than in the past 73
- teachers are less appreciated or valued today rather than in the past 90
- Students at universities often have a choice of places to live. They may choose to live in university dormitories, or they may choose to live in apartments in the community. 76
- TPO 29- Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska’s North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold, Arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, the environment of the 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in an apartment. From my point of view, living in an apartment is very expensive...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99755501222 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83067248586 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491442542787 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9521480957 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4761904762 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34110151647 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118013374356 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762799441008 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226049663773 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432011159094 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.