Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B.C. This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood from humans. While there is still no cure for malaria, there are three main strategies that we hope will lead to the eradication of this disease which kills nearly half a million people around the world each year.
The first strategy is to fight the malaria parasite itself by treating patients with powerful prescription medicines. Patients are tested to determine which strain of the malaria parasite is present, as different areas of the world have different strains of the parasite. Then, an effective medicine is administered to combat the symptoms of the infection.
The second strategy is to kill the mosquitoes that transfer the parasite to humans. Killing the adult mosquitoes using chemical sprays is a common option, but the larvae of the mosquitoes can also be killed where they develop, in pools of warm, still water. These larvae can be killed using chemicals, but another popular approach is to release fish into the water that prey on the larvae such as guppies to eat the larvae before they mature into adults.
The third strategy is called the sterile insect technique. "Sterile" means the insect cannot reproduce. This strategy involves breeding and hatching millions of mosquitoes, sterilizing the males with low-level gamma rays, and then releasing them into the wild population. Females that mate with the sterile males produce eggs which do not hatch, and this causes the mosquitoes to die out. This strategy has been effective in wiping out a number of insect pests including the screw-worm and several types of fruit flies.
Recently, there has been a ton of debate as to the effectiveness to eradicate malaria. More specifically, In regards to thr passage the writer puts forth the idea that there are three processes we can eradicate malaria. However, the lecturer is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in the writer's claims. In facts, the professor believes these three processes are not effective, and address, in details, the troube with each point made in the reading text.
Firstly, the author of the reading states that by using prescription medicine we can reduce malaria. Some professionals , however , in the same field stands in firm opposition to this claims. In the listening , for example, the lecture claims that these madicine only effective for specific species. He goes on to say that new specises are not killed by those medicine.
Secondly, one group of scholar represented by the writer thinks that by killing the mosquito that transfer the malaria we can eradicate it. Of course, though , not all experts in this sector belives this is accurate. Again the professor specifically address this point when he states that in this process the most of the mosquito fly away .Additionall he notes that fishes and other species can be affected.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that by sterilize the male mosquito we can eradicate the malaria. Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue by contending that these sterilised male can not mate with the femail mosquitos and the mating ability of these mosquito also deleted.
To sum up, both the witer and l;ecturer halds conflicting view about the effectiveness to eradicate malaria. It is clear that, they will have trouble in finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...o eradicate malaria. More specifically, In regards to thr passage the writer puts forth the i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e can reduce malaria. Some professionals , however , in the same field stands in f...
^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ce malaria. Some professionals , however , in the same field stands in firm opposi...
^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...same field stands in firm opposition to this claims. In the listening , for example,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...osition to this claims. In the listening , for example, the lecture claims that th...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this medicine' or 'those medicines'?
Suggestion: this medicine; those medicines
...say that new specises are not killed by those medicine. Secondly, one group of scholar repr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a we can eradicate it. Of course, though , not all experts in this sector belives ...
^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rocess the most of the mosquito fly away .Additionall he notes that fishes and oth...
^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionall
...cess the most of the mosquito fly away .Additionall he notes that fishes and other species ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this mosquito' or 'these mosquitoes', 'these mosquitos'?
Suggestion: this mosquito; these mosquitoes; these mosquitos
...ail mosquitos and the mating ability of these mosquito also deleted. To sum up, both the wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in fact, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 287.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09407665505 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68169411596 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2575287468 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161611988154 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520643195677 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356931151681 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847421940365 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469732651909 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.