Many people have a strong will to persuade others to believe their social or political view. They always debate with others in anywhere, anytime. However, some of them are teachers. With spreading their view in the classroom, they can making presentation in their class, because it can satisfy their will to persuade. However, I insist the opinion that teacher should not making their social or political views known to student in the classroom.
Firstly, making their political view public may cause some student's unsatisfied. If a student's father, or his/her close relationship peer, even himself/herself is a big fan of a party, there might happens worse things. For example, If the teacher states that he very hate a specific party's policy, or the party itself, he might abuse the party without re-consideration in the class. Obviously, it can irritate the party's advocator, because it can be seen as an abuse to themselves. The result is, however, such party's crazy fan might convene a collection to protest their political or social views. It will harm the reputation of the school because it is a scandal of such kind of teacher, as well as the life of the teacher, for he might not able to be a teacher anymore. So, In order to protect himself, as a teacher, he is better to not make him policy view public.
Secondly, teacher's policy view might not suitable in modern society, for his view haven't be checked by anyone. A teacher might hold a anachronistic view, such as Nazi and dictatorship. If a teacher output his view, with a group of student support him, it might cause another terrible result. For example, they might organize a group, with supporting group's member and exclude others, making the school system cannot work well. In such a group, if any member be bullied by others, others might take adventure to fight back. Then, it will become a riot, without rules, without police, just fight with others, which will not be a happy ending to anyone. So, in order to make the school peace and love, teacher should not public his unchecked social view.
In conclusion, everybody have their own freedom to convey their social or political view, but as a teacher, they'd better not to make their view public.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...g their view in the classroom, they can making presentation in their class, because it...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...ist the opinion that teacher should not making their social or political views known t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...uitable in modern society, for his view havent be checked by anyone. A teacher might h...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...checked by anyone. A teacher might hold a anachronistic view, such as Nazi and di...
^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...might organize a group, with supporting groups member and exclude others, making the s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'd
...al or political view, but as a teacher, theyd better not to make their view public.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85564304462 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57752136719 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48031496063 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1283972668 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.05 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475149920396 0.236089414692 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159981978475 0.076458572812 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186055868971 0.0737576698707 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343725920327 0.150856017488 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133254155678 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...g their view in the classroom, they can making presentation in their class, because it...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...ist the opinion that teacher should not making their social or political views known t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...uitable in modern society, for his view havent be checked by anyone. A teacher might h...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...checked by anyone. A teacher might hold a anachronistic view, such as Nazi and di...
^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...might organize a group, with supporting groups member and exclude others, making the s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'd
...al or political view, but as a teacher, theyd better not to make their view public.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85564304462 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57752136719 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48031496063 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1283972668 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.05 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475149920396 0.236089414692 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159981978475 0.076458572812 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186055868971 0.0737576698707 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343725920327 0.150856017488 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133254155678 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.