technology has made children less creative than children in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
The 20th and 21th centuries are characterized by all the momentous changes which have been made in human lives. Perhaps the most important milestone of these two centuries is the advent of sophisticated technology. Vast majorities of people might argue that such a change has caused some unfavorable consequences in human lives. Stemming from this fact, a relevant question that is a moot point is whether nowadays technology influenced children's creativity negatively than previous years. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that in spite of all significant advantages, technology has deleterious effects on children's lives. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that in today's hectic city of life technology has penetrated every single facet of our lives and although it helps people especially children to make a progress and flourish in their personal life day in day out, it has created some trials and tribulations for children, which put their health into danger. Generally phrased, based on recent studies conducted by some scholars, today's' children are more dependable to the electronic device and some technological advancement rather than children in past time because of an invention of new technologies all around the world. For instance, a plethora of children get used to stay at home and play video games in solitude. So, this situation not only can affect children's social activities but also can influence their health negatively. In fact, radiation emitted by the screen can deteriorate children's eyesight in the long run. To elucidate more on this issue, children in the past were healthier owing to the fact that hardly ever they play electronically. In fact, crowds of them preferred outdoor activities like soccer, volleyball, swimming and so forth. As a matter of fact, these kinds of plays patronize children not only lead a healthy life but also grow maturely.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that not only can technology restrict children's mind but also can limit their thinking. To put it in another word, many types of research have shown that children at an early age are talent and creative but technological advancement could diminish this creativity. As a tangible example, children in the past did not use the calculator in their study and solve the problems by their own creativity. But nowadays children rely on calculator even for the simplest problem in order to resolve problems. Going into the depth, although technology might help children vigorously, it can discourage children from thinking wisely and deeply about surrounding problems. However, with the advent of new technology children have become more intelligent due to the fact that it provides an opportunity for them to keep on their education and reach a tertiary education. Indeed, new technologies have encouraged children to be creative and curious toward any situation.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...cal advancement rather than children in past time because of an invention of new technolo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, in spite of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2565.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29958677686 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91531414905 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553719008264 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 797.4 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6419193066 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.590909091 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324392826245 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929974413328 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655281441433 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165746208864 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105088695217 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.