In the modern world rapid development of technology affect to the society in good aspects as well as bad aspects. With the development children used technology more than in the past. Personally, I believe that these high-tech activities caused to create more creative child than he or she may in the past. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, with development of technical field, almost all the students have access to the internet. With availability of internet students can learn lot of new things and new theories very easily. Before the few decades, the students need to go to libraries or they must buy books to help their academics works, but now student can access these books and buy these books very easily. When this knowledge is free, it will encourage students to create new innovations than before. The example from research fields such as science can bolster this claim. In the past most innovations happen without learning from experiences, because unavailability of information. Example like eye-glasses found by Chinese and Europeans in the same period without knowing each other. If this two people could interact with each other one party could be spend that time to create more innovative thing. Therefore, with this example we can conclude that with the access to internet make more creative people than in the past.
Secondly, technology innovations made life easy. Children in the past have spent more time to travelling or helping their parents with the day today works. However, with the development of fast electrical trains, highways and developed roads might help children to come home very faster than before. With availability of more time leads to make creative peoples since they have free time slots to experiment new things. My personal experience is compelling example for this. When I was a student my school is far away from my hometown, which take almost two hours to travel from home. In this time, I have no time to do or think about new things since I feel very tired after long travelling time. However, when I am in final years at school our government construct new highway path and because of that I can travel to home within one hour or less. With this, I get more free time and in that time, I began to build small robots and that knowledge is helped me lot in the future.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that technology development makes more creative younger generation than past. This is because chances to access free knowledge with internet and this development save our time to think creatively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 770, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...same period without knowing each other. If this two people could interact with eac...
^^
Line 3, column 1010, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more creative people than in the past. Secondly, technology innovations made li...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 982, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owledge is helped me lot in the future. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88314606742 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57420021642 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496629213483 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6801233525 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5416666667 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5416666667 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.20833333333 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151720933256 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536152867532 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076157421359 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117553798662 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565564756136 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.