Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past
To begin with, I would like to say that modern technologies are considered to be a big breakthrough in people’s life. Moreover, they can be compared to the essential part of our life and they are used in every sphere such as studying, working, communicating and so on. Needless to say that different people say different things about it. Some of them think that computers make our life easier and more comfortable whilst others believe that computers are a waste of their time and they have only negative influence. As far as I am concerned, I am positive that technologies help children and give an opportunity to improve their imagination and to be more creative.
Firstly, nowadays, mobile phones are very popular among children and they like to play some computer games. They are contributing to the development of children’s creative. For example, when they play some strategy games, they will learn how to solve different problems and develop children’s thinking. Also, there are some video games where they can experience how to communicate with other people and how to act in different situations. So, we can say that these games help to be more creative in different ways.
Secondly, with the help of technologies, children have more access to the information that is necessary for them. Computers can be useful for those who should create a project or to know something new in a sphere which is interesting for a child. The Internet provides different ways to make learning more interesting. For instance, creating a presentation, student can use different tools, pictures or videos in order to make the material memorable and involve students to study a subject.
In conclusion, I would like to say that I strongly believe that technologies has made children more creative. They can greatly improve the life of every person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudent can use different tools, pictures or videos in order to make the material ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08496732026 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98664205378 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532679738562 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7159925463 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166999803797 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637951648067 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538795226414 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118629525074 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654318148629 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.