Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other. Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages. Which type of communication do you prefer and why? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Make sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
There is no shortage of opinion on how technology has affected the communication between people. If I were force to choose, I would definitely select to talk over phone rather than over text messages. It is my firm belief that this is a better way of communication using technology for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, talking over phone is a better way to understand the emotions of the person we are talking to, which can't be done over text. Talking over phone is more natural because the response is very original and direct which can be manipulated over text. Sometimes while texting a friend it can be someone else responding to you using their phone, which can be prevented by talking over phone. Texting is not possible everytime and everywhere. For example, you might be cooking and you need your attention completely there so, it is impossible to text but convenient to call.
Secondly, sometimes during urgent matters talking over phone can save you a lot of time. For instance, during an emergency you can call someone and explain them what you want them to do, while working simultaneously on the emergency. Drawing from my own experience, when I was in an accident recently my phone's screen was completely cracked and it was very difficult to type without hurting your fingers so, the man who was helping me called my parents and helped me get in the ambulance. If either of us would have stopped to text it would have wasted a lot of time.
In conclusion, if I had an option to choose between either text or call. I would prefer to call because the emotions are more transparent on call and it is more convenient to talk over call.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... of the person we are talking to, which cant be done over text. Talking over phone i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[4]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'responds'.
Suggestion: responds
...texting a friend it can be someone else responding to you using their phone, which can be ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nts and helped me get in the ambulance. If either of us would have stopped to text...
^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had stopped'?
Suggestion: had stopped
...e get in the ambulance. If either of us would have stopped to text it would have wasted a lot of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6798679868 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65902574882 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528052805281 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1166206593 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233500489127 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824964411592 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406327142278 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133920598558 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052659125636 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.