Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other. Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages. What type of communication do you prefer and why?
People can chitchat with others through texts or calls thanks to smartphones and other high-tech devices. In fact, people's way of communicating with others may heavily influence the quality of conversation with others and the understanding about the talk. I believe that sharing thoughts with others through text messages is appropriate way of discussing ,matters with others. I have three main rationales for holding this opinion, and I will develop these ideas in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, individuals can think about what they will write, and others can see texts clearly, which means the communication will be free of burden. People tend to forget what they were willing to say while calling to others through mobile phone. Additionally, people who are receiving calls and hearkening to what others are saying can miss some parts of speech because of hesitation and wrong intonation. On the other hand, people can think about what they will tell others before they write it, which means they will express their thoughts comprehensively and correctly. Furthermore, people will only see texts that are not influenced by any problem such as wrong intonation. As a result of this, people can avoid some misleading conversations. In summation, because individuals can have some time to consider what they will write and they can write in text format, their writing will be free of flaw.
Secondly, people can connote pleasant memories after long run. Memory is pleasant experience for most people, which is why they want to see records related to things happened in the past again. However, if people talk over call, they cannot listen the call again unless they record the talk. Unfortunately, recording others' talks can be immoral, not to say illegal. Conversely, we can simple see text messages by scrolling the chat history, so we can connote satisfactory memories from the past. Then, we can enjoy moments by feeling nostalgic. Long story short, individuals can appreciate what they experienced in the past by taking a look at texts they wrote beforehand.
Finally, humans do not have to pay for text messages, which makes it possible for them to have a conversation with others regularly. In my country, calling to others require three cents for every minute, so people usually cannot talk with others for a long time through the phone. Therefore, their opportunity to talk with others is limited due to financial trouble. Moreover, I guess that call is expensive in other countries as well, so this influence is not only constrained to my nation. In contrast, individuals do not have to pay anything if they text to others, thus they can text to others whenever they want. Thereby, they can spend a long time by talking with others, which helps people to understand each other well. To sum up, people can spend an enough time by chitchatting with others because they do not have to pay money for texting.
In conclusion, people better write texts to others when they want to discuss matters with others. People can judge what they write and others can see things clearly without being affected by some trouble such as hesitation that occurs during talk over cellphone. In addition, individuals can connote fine matters later on by seeing texts again. Last but not least, not paying to type messages will help people to send messages to others whenever they want.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...essages is appropriate way of discussing ,matters with others. I have three main r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, i guess, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 32.0 9.8082437276 326% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2837.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 562.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04804270463 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62103992832 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462633451957 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 839.7 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9766510972 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8275862069 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3793103448 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.79310344828 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297764329776 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106294317714 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655756055163 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205097139033 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650952846819 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.