Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
I think, one of the best way for manufacturers for selling their production is advertising, and there is no problem if their goal is children.
Advertising is a very good way because it can familiarize children with new things. Nowadays people do not have enough time to bring their at the shop centers to see new production, so if the government eliminate it from television, how they will notice from their world? Yes, this program is really useful and essential for the children to see and learn beneficial things.
Some advertising are really enjoyable. I think most of the directors know how to produce a suitable program for the children. Most of them try to use cartoons' characters. These characters are really cute and make the program attractive for the children because children look at them like their favorite cartoon.
Finally, it is a false idea that people think the advertisers try to misuse from this program to deceive children to buy what they see on the program. In fact, there is no different between children and adult viewer because children look at like an enjoyable program, and most of the time they do not understand the meaning of that. The most important group that are impressed by them is an adult one. For example, they see that a new smartphone is produced, and tomorrow they buy it. So, if we want to restrict advertising, at first we should limit it for adult people, not children.
As I said, advertising advantages overwhelm its disadvantages for these reasons. First, it can be informative for children. Second, it is like a cartoon, not more, and finally, they do not understand the goal of the advertising is selling their production since it does not have any danger for them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, really, second, so, for example, i think, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 296.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83108108108 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76745902184 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496621621622 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4753481163 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.375 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117305893405 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503862569124 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037804004144 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730703743228 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234054430357 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.