In times of an economic crisis in which area should governments reduce their spending 1 Arts 2 Scientific research 3 Parks and public gardens | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

In times of an economic crisis, in which area should governments reduce their
spending? 1. Arts 2. Scientific research 3. Parks and public gardens.

No one can cast a shadow of a doubt that governments should decide an optimal way for decreasing investment in any way which is not useful for people living in their country. There are many ways, in this turn, governments can improve their budgets in order to build better areas, but most of them have some negative points, so they should find a better way considering almost all parts of society, not only a specific group. I, personally, of the opinion that investigating arts is not an effective way for people of society, most of whom are ordinary people and suffer from economic problems, and I will explain my points of view in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, when a country is suffering from an economic crisis such as inflation, the main group which is more exposed to experience harmful situations are ordinary people. In this chaotic era, people should work from the dawn to the dust in order to afford everyday expenditures, so they do not have appropriate time for going to art exhibitions. To illustrate this issue, take people who cannot afford their common families’ demands as an obvious example; they should work two or more shifts; therefore, they cannot find any time in order to go to the arts. If they could easily afford families’ needs, they could devote time to entertainments.
Moreover, this kind of person needs other attention rather than some ways providing entertainment because living conditions are day by day become more and more sophisticated so that governments should provide a way to improve people’s livelihood after that they decide on other aspects of people’s life such as arts. For example, I have worked in a charity for three years, and I saw may families who suffered from starvation, and they always try to find a way to improve their families’ situation they do not know anything about arts and any fancy exhibitions. To me, governments should consider this kind of person in order to preserve many other problems such as crimes, burglary, and so forth which they could make by the lack of considering these vulnerable people.
To sum up, governments should consider many issues in order to devote a suitable decision which considers almost all groups of society in this era in which people suffer from a lack of basic needs. Therefore, if governments cannot find an appropriate way for spending their budgets, society will prone to experiencing many unpredictable problems. My attitude toward this issue is governments should consider the vital needs of people then they try to improve society in other ways such as providing arts.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2020-10-05	Talaysnp	70	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user Talaysnp :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, kind of, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97011494253 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7635435003 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475862068966 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2106241384 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.307692308 100.406767564 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4615384615 20.6045352989 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181115057171 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802391652643 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328652317351 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128028639143 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296467465386 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 11.7677419355 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.