toefl 55
It is widely acknowledged that in this progressive and sophisticated world that we live in, communicating and exchanging ideas can be done in lots of ways. And in what way we do this communication can have a direct effect on the end. Althoug, some people think that taking advantage from the new technology and using ways such as mail and online platform can help ease the procces, others stand at the other side of the continuum, holding the view that discussing a project whether it is related to school or work would be better in person. personally speaking, I strongly agree with this idea, and the reason and explanations for this viewpoing are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with it is generally believed that speaking in person can help the proccess of developing ideas. Therefore, if we convey during a project, we can go back and forth and come up with new ideas to make the project better. To drive this notion home I will make an example. Few months ago I was exhausted working on an group project. Nometter what I did I could not solve a problem about it and my partner was the same as me. At first we mailed each other but since it did not help, we startd talking on the phone. Although talking helped a little, but the major problems were not solved yet. In the end, when we were approachind the deadline, we decided to meet each other for the first time since the start of the project. After a few hours, we were shooting idea back and forth. With the help of open communication and being able to speak in person we solved all of the difficulties of the work and did a top notch job
Secondly, it is not a secret to anyone that because of the limits of mailing, arguments are harder desolve in this kind of communication. When humans sea each other, they use non-verval signals, as well as verval signals. Those non-verbal signals are nessesary for the human interaction in intense situations. Thus, if the group come to a slight disagreement that lack of human conection can drive the group to extreme chaus. Therefore, as contention is an inevidable part of woring with others, human contact is needed. My own experienve is a compelling illustrarion of this matter. Recently I joind a work project. Because of COVID we only chatted with mailing. after a while when I felt that when I'm trying to talk to others about my thought on the project, they were egnoring me. The fact was that they were not and this problem was solely becase of the lack of human contact.
In conclustion having aforementioned all of there reasons and example into account, I strongly think that wirking in person has far more benefits into it. Not only it help us desoling the differences, but it also better the developement of ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 542, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...hool or work would be better in person. personally speaking, I strongly agree with this id...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...w months ago I was exhausted working on an group project. Nometter what I did I co...
^^
Line 3, column 867, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...being able to speak in person we solved all of the difficulties of the work and did a top ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 913, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
... the difficulties of the work and did a top notch job Secondly, it is not a secret to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 618, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...atter. Recently I joind a work project. Because of COVID we only chatted with mailing. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 665, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... of COVID we only chatted with mailing. after a while when I felt that when Im tryin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mailing. after a while when I felt that when Im trying to talk to others about m...
^^
Line 5, column 702, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...g. after a while when I felt that when Im trying to talk to others about my thoug...
^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
... far more benefits into it. Not only it help us desoling the differences, but it als...
^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...s desoling the differences, but it also better the developement of ideas.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, kind of, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6586825595 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522540983607 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0447460142 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.28 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.52 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.