TOEFL iBT 2016 16 OCTOBER
Do you agree or disagree? Asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach young children.
According to some families thought, they don’t allow for their kids to be with other because it is possible their kids learn inappropriate cases from their same-aged kids. From my vantage point, it has lots of benefits to demand children to working in small groups. Not only do children learn to be more sociable, but also they learn to reach their goals in working in small groups. I subscribe this way which I will explore in the following essay.
The first exquisite point to mention is that children may be more sociable as working groups. Not surprisingly, they will be able to learn social activities such as how to contact each other, how to behave with each other efficiently and etc. When they experience some activities they learn and consequently try to use them in another position. A vivid example can be shed light on this subject is my own experience. When I was primary school student, me and two other of my classmates were being ready to a math competition. According to our teacher suggestion, we decided to study together. This working together caused me to contact with my friends even after school time and in the public libraries. Actually, it was my first time to go outside with my friends and use public libraries. Therefore, working in group caused me to learn some valuable actions.
Another reason that deserves some words is that kids can learn group working. Group working has lots of advantages which kids can exploit in their future. Group members, at first glance, can learn each other’s skills. Also, according to many psychologists, kids in group working are so motivated therefore, they learn as soon as possible and sometimes since some kids in order to prove their abilities, they maximize the ability of learning. The experience of working group also causes kids to work in groups in other positions especially if they go to the universities and work on the special academic project with other students and professors. Again, I refer to my experience. In learning and being ready for the math competition, in order to show myself off, I l tried to learn questions and mathematics materials sooner than already. Of course, when I was a student at the university and working on group projects, the experience of the school was with my mind all the time.
To make long story short, I assert that working group is strongly useful for the kids in the light of the aforementioned reasons. Certainly, the working group can help kids reach learn a lot.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
According to some families thought, they...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will explore in the following essay. The first exquisite point to mention is ...
^^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...w to behave with each other efficiently and etc. When they experience some activities th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed me to learn some valuable actions. Another reason that deserves some words ...
^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to group'
Suggestion: to group
...erves some words is that kids can learn group working. Group working has lots of adva...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...school was with my mind all the time. To make long story short, I assert that ...
^^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... group can help kids reach learn a lot.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85480093677 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68856742983 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473067915691 0.524837075471 90% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.994623655914 402% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4686245994 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1304347826 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5652173913 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65217391304 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122407338761 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459653251338 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472271694381 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906479364605 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249061427585 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.