I agree to the the statement that one should not be judged by external appearances. Appearances can be deceiving. This has been proven over and over again. Let me state few examples to support this.
A famous musician started playing Beethoven's symphony in New York's Penn station. Most people just ignored him. Two days later he played the same music in a classical opera house and the ticket prices were more than $100 per seat. This goes to say that most people either due to lack of time of egoistic behavior tend to ignore and demean people who do not look rich in appearance.
Another famous example is King of Rajasthan, strolling on the streets of London enquired the price of Rolls Royce. The salesman and the manager thinking that he is an ordinary person of low or no value at all, pushed him out of the showroom. The King then decided to purchase 10 Rolls Royce cars and use it as a garbage collection trucks. When the company heard of this, its managing director flew down all the way from London to India, apologized to the King and gave him replacement cars for free and even refunded the amount.
This goes without saying that looks can be deceptive initially and one should never judge a person just by external appearances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
I agree to the the statement that one should not be judged...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
I agree to the the statement that one should not be judged...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 1977.66487455 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 221.0 407.700716846 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65610859729 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39848030345 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.68778280543 0.524837075471 131% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 618.680645161 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6436476329 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1538461538 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 5.45110844103 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157799802289 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061665032565 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137743411745 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123172069208 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111844054822 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.