I believe that in a few decades into the future, we will see much fewer cars on the streets than today. In fact, given the proceeding reasons, it is understood that the likelyhood of such an occurance is very strong. This is due to the fact that the willingless to produce such instruments, as well as the inclination to use them will diminish quickly. Soon, these monstrosities occupying our streets will be deprecated.
The first outcry will be the enviromental issues. This is where the government will step in. Cars are instruments that produce massive amounts of various types of polutions among them noise and air polutions. Man is starting to realize that he is in a state of coexistence with the enviroment. It cannot simply neglect the effects that his adventures are having on the planet. The enviromental hazards casued by cars is a well-known fact and many companies have tried to contain it. But a nation-wide effort will soon become nessacary, as the efforts made by the companies is simply not enough. That is one of the reasons that replacing cars with other forms of transportation is so important.
Next on the list is the various costs concerned with making these cars. Unfortunately when compared to other forms of transportation like buses, trains or planes, cars seem to be the least costly products at first sight. But a closer inspection sheds some new light on this premise. In fact, when we take into account what “cost” really means, we realize that they may in fact, be the most expensive transportation product. If we define cost in a manner that takes into account the non-renewable consumption of our natural resources, then we can see how matters like recycling out-of-purpose cars and other issues greatly add up to the costs. Of course, these costs are not visible initially and it would take some hindsight to realize the importance of the issue.
Additionally, the way people transport between places is greatly changing. People’s cutlure is rapidly changing giving rise to an inclination towards using public transport for all the benefits that it has to offer. On the other hand, fewer people are willing to drive their own cars, citing issues like safety and comfort. Many simply enjoy the social aspect of taking the bus instead of driving to work. Therefore, it is undersood that people would rather see fewer cars on the streets, as they deem them inefficent and see better alternatives for it.
In conclusion, I would be of the opinion that fewer and fewer cars per person will be in use in the following years. The government cannot handle the enviromental issues without first dealing with the problem of air-polluting cars. The high costs of manufacturing cars, along with the consumption of the earth’s resources at a suprisingly fast pace together with people’s tendencies to prefer public transportation in this age and year, all contribute to the replacement of cars with more effective transportation systems in the near future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, in fact, of course, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2517.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.034 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95668665908 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2067255357 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8076923077 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88461538462 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162906216072 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457713547652 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511810618686 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989551468606 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484198696889 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.