With the huge expansion of the world's population. Transportation became one of the most concerning issues around the globe. Some people argue that in the next twenty years, the world will witness a considerable decline in a number of cars. Personally, I disagree with this for the following reasons.
To begin with, while there are myriad ways of transportation, cars remain the most comfortable method for most of the people. Private cars enable the person to manage his time as he wants. Moreover, even with raised taxes and awareness of the pollution issues, most of the population still opt to use their own cars for the seek of their convenience. As a result, the car industry became more expanded, and the number of the cars that produced by these companies is enhanced to a noticeable level. All these factors make the opportunity to cut down on the cars' number in the next years an extremely hard to believe. For instance, a friend of mine who works in vehicles factory told me that their profits have been raised about fifty percent more than the previous year, due to the fact that the number of the customers have increased to a great level and it continues to rise.
Furthermore, the other methods of transportation like bus, metro, and trains are less convenient, because they have a strict time schedule. besides, most of them are not available at late night despite their availability during the day. For example, when I was studying at the University of Khartoum, I was living out of the campus, so, when I had late classes, it was really difficult for me to find a bus. thus, most of the time I had no choice other than hiring a taxi which was really expensive. Consequently, I decided to buy a car which I think was one of the best decision I ever made. and actually, most of my friends thought in a similar way. so, if the people look for their comfort, the number of them who use the cars will, indeed, elevated rather than decreasing.
In conclusion, in contrary to what some nation think; the world will witness an incredible growth in the number of the people who depend on their cars as a principal way of transportation. this is attributed to the fact that most of the people, nowadays, prefer to ride their own cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
With the huge expansion of the worlds population. Transportation became one o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...cause they have a strict time schedule. besides, most of them are not available at late...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... really difficult for me to find a bus. thus, most of the time I had no choice other...
^^^^
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...s one of the best decision I ever made. and actually, most of my friends thought in...
^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nd actually, most of my friends thought in a similar way. so, if the people look for their comfo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...of my friends thought in a similar way. so, if the people look for their comfort, ...
^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s as a principal way of transportation. this is attributed to the fact that most of ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, moreover, really, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65829145729 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68204753035 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4473616907 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5789473684 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47368421053 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1106421139 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375720704355 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343555947648 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710201939419 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309006370391 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.