TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, cars is becoming a necessarity for most of people. In whatever situation, like commuting, traveling and all, cars is of vital importance when considering the long distance and the precious time. However, some people think that the quantity of cars in twenty years will decline. They may state that there are many other efficient ways, for example, by air or by undergrounding, could substitute the status of the car. While, in my opinion, this are possible but the possibility is still slim.

To begin with, cars are the most convenient traveling tools than any other ones, and this quality render them hardly to be less in use. Consider the general situation of using of cars. We often use cars to go to the specific location we hope to achieve. However, one cannot dream the airplane could leave him/her to the same place, like home or working place. Meanwhile, since we live on the lands, there is no deny that we most often use cars or trains rather than airplane or ship. If roads exist, then the car could go. But not all trains or underground route could be so developed as car if we take the landscope into account. So, even other transports are faster and more comfortable, we have to use cars in most situations.

Besides, cars give us the privadaiton which is less probable to have. Cars are relatively samll and, cheep. So, everyone could own one for transpotation. On the other hand, other transports couldn't be bought by most people. Thus, individuals have to huddle together however you are refused. Maybe there are independent rooms leaving for you, but you still need to wait with others to travel. You don't have the right to determine when you could leave. On the contrary, the cars allow you to have your own decisions. And with more and more people supposed to be born, the cars is hardly to ocuppy less quatities in the transportation markets.

In conclusion, the cars' quantity in use is more likely maintian today's level or even increase, since the convenience and provitation qualities of cars.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ays, cars is becoming a necessarity for most of people. In whatever situation, like commuting,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...on. On the other hand, other transports couldnt be bought by most people. Thus, individ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...need to wait with others to travel. You dont have the right to determine when you co...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80341880342 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61068792296 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8081428015 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3043478261 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2608695652 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69565217391 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19654488046 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581428967458 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384921371556 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112628619313 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311005897544 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.