Most of us have heard phrases like “you must” or “you have to” when it comes to our future work and responsibilites. We supposed working is an obligatory thing to do for earning and saving money, and usually such obligations can’t be joyful and pleasant. Everything has been changed nowadays, and I assert that people prefer to combine thier hobbies with a job, in other words, people’s personal enjoyment-doing things became the things they should do as cantemporary working responsibilities.
First of all, students often choose future jobs more wisely and precisely with an eye on the personal intersts. We spend about 8 hours in the workplace, and It is understandable, why the most important criterias of a preferable job for the young people are a big salary and an interesting task. My generation not only want to be rich and fameous, but also want to be intersted in what they will do in the future. For example, a student in our biology class was making illustrations all of her free time. She had lots of sketches on the notes, and I have never seen her without pensil in her hand. After graduation she decided to enroll on the arts department in the most prestigious university in Russia, and now she is working as an illustratior in the newspapper.
Secondly, people tend to change career pathway to different or even opposite directions, if they think thier work doesn’t enough suite them. I have seen a lot of people who dropped out of universities or quit perspective jobs because they weren’t satisfy by the working perspectives. The closest friend of mine was working in the big biotechnological company on the prestigious job when he decided to make his own You-tube channel. I know it may seem like an unjustified risk, but he was looking forward to change his office rutine work with a lot of stress and disappointments to the something captivating and joyful. Therefore, this decision bring him an opportinity to earn money from what he was doing as a outside interst.
Finally, I believe that people, who spend extra hours on the working place, enjoy thier work as much as they enjoy personal free time. I have red one statistical data recently, which was connected with creteries of the sucseesful people working in the different fields. And the most sagnify creteria identified by the statistics became passion to the work you do. So, in other words, if you like your job you will try to make the best of you to sucseed. You will stay extra hours not because of the angry boss, but because of the happy hours are not watching.
In conclusion, I want to say that I truly belive that most of the people will choose thier career, based on their preferences. I hope that the examples given above have sufficiently expressed my opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cantemporary working responsibilities. First of all, students often choose futu...
^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...graduation she decided to enroll on the arts department in the most prestigious univ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...to earn money from what he was doing as a outside interst. Finally, I believe...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87866108787 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94862435764 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537656903766 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8237484887 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.047619048 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7619047619 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227751907015 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660258526306 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744813029327 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126239324911 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778222094351 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.