Technology has become one crucial part of our daily. Even though there are some arguments about technology influence the creativity of child bad or good, I believe that the cons of the technology toward children outweigh pros for the following reasons.
Above all, because of amazing technologies which have to make life easier and convenient, children become lazy to be creative. In the past, children wash their clothes by hand which turns the hand skin harsher, so, they need to think about the solution to use less water which helps the children to learn from real life. In contrast, nowadays the only thing the children need to do laundry is to click on the button that appears on the washing machine.
Furthermore, people do not read books anymore because the internet provides much information but this influence bad for children to expand their knowledge. In the past, without the internet, children search through the books which give them more than they wanted during the research. On the other hand, from the internet, children only get the information related to their school work or homework, nothing more than that. For example, when I read a physics book to get information about energy, in the end, I become familiar with all the topics such as thermodynamics and mechanics, not only energy. However, if I search energy from the google, I get only the topics about energy.
Finally, the communication skill limited by the technology consumption. Instead of interacting with people, children prefer to use their own electronic devices everywhere even in school. I think the ability of communication improved only through interaction with people who surrounded them. For example, my younger brother who addicted into the computer and games has no idea about talking to strangers and asking the route whether he lost or not. It is nothing to do with his shyness, he only does not know how to talk to people.
All in all, there are many disadvantages of using technology despite its advantages. From my point of view, the ability to being creative sustained by the interaction with people and the objects except for technologies.
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice76
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.76
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem71
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r60
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, except for, for example, i think, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05056179775 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68578695812 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558988764045 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5402418806 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.764705882 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166306014861 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537808836471 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032992696027 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944215898844 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018470427183 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.