The most common definition of a friend is the second family. Some people believe that it is better to have a friend who knows each other for a long time. On the hand, others think that making new friends is better instead. From my point of view, keeping my old friends is more beneficial and crucial for me instead of making many new. This is because it is the natural behavior of humans that most people forget about you if you pay less attention to them.
Above all, old friends influence more on people than others because people trust them more. If a person struggles with something, they should ask for advice from the old friends because they know well about your personality and taste of everything. Moreover, not everyone tells the truth about your weakness such as look, because it feels uncomfortable and may seem that they are jealous of you. However, if you listen to the cons of you from your old friend, it may affect you to change it because of your belief.
Another reason is that the old friends can give you space while the new friends require plenty of time to know each other and take your relationship to the next stage. I think that you have already many old friends, so, it is not that necessary to make many new which waste your time to develop yourself even though you experience the whole new world.
All in all, the value of friends not measured by its count, but it depends on how deep a relationship you are in with your friend. The pros of keeping old friends instead of replacing them with whole new outweigh the cons of it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, well, while, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49122807018 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22151543084 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519298245614 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.909320377 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4615384615 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298896938545 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11692187887 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558840099001 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196418751619 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331992018355 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 58.1214874552 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 86.8835125448 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.