The reading passage states that work as a team on a project increases the efficiency of work. However, the lecturer cast doubt on each of the author's idea.
First and foremost, the reading suggests that the team includes many members which make the experience, knowledge, and skills broader than individuals which trigger the team to makes the decision quicker. On the other hand, the professor says that it takes a long time to build an agreement because the ideas refuted by only one team member disappears fast which requires a team to find a new idea of a project.
Secondly, the article indicates that the team members divide the responsibility of a team which allows them to take a risk. In contrast, the lecturer argues that some members who told the teamwork went wrong may be ignored by others. What if they failed on a project, the innocent member also treats like a guilty because of their team.
Lastly, the passage states that the team member could shine if the overall result of a team is good. The professor made a counterclaim to the idea by sharing an example. According to him, some team members become a free rider, and the others do whole work of a team in order to not fail. Moreover, there is no proof and name in the result of the project, which makes some member angry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... the lecturer cast doubt on each of the authors idea. First and foremost, the readi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64069264069 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42812768438 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3396730294 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4545454545 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315345481922 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12377023087 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059712228444 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195950510612 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452282736708 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.