The Context really advocate why literature has been fading importance in society, there are couple of nuances made for why this phenomenon is happening. But the author does not fairly supports the idea mentioned in the context and she makes some cogent remarks which in our other way are very much coherant and weighted. Some couple of surmises have been challenged by author in context, let us discuss some them below.
Firstly, eventhough recent study show there been sharp decline in reading literature young generation, there are plethora of books such history, geography and other in genre, which still are been read by the young people and that too come in literature secton. Author truly advocates that this kind of genre of books can be made more lively and inventive which we lead interest of young crowd. So thus positive take aways from reading literature can be effectively done, if author also work in this kind of remote genre's.
Secondly, as stated in paraphrase that young people gives more importance to trivial kind of entertainment, you can it television and surfing through the internet in comparison to read through the more challenging kind of novel in the market. But, author duly contradicts this statement backing that we can not call the prevalence of media over literature as replacement which is happening around. There more inventive, curious and effective shows gets published on media in comparison to old style of giving lot of time to literature. She assert the that culture on course of time, so thus we need to embrace it and supports the change.
Lastly, the context backs that due to unintersted yong people, talented authors failes to get audience and leading to relatively lowering there support from the publishers. There are some cogent remarks asserted in the context backed with some serious notes, but speaker has mentoned pragmatic supporting reason why yong crowd lead to this kind of environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'support'
Suggestion: support
...ppening. But the author does not fairly supports the idea mentioned in the context and s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to come'?
Suggestion: to come
... been read by the young people and that too come in literature secton. Author truly advo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...f giving lot of time to literature. She assert the that culture on course of time, so ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, still, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08411214953 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58819454111 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566978193146 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8419707649 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117423122176 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411210043526 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449623662973 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667898680148 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538467154204 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.