TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

By and large, the amount of knowledge of individuals concerning their academic subjects have turned into the vital matter among the societies. While numerous persons argue that learning specific subject can be highly beneficial, I personally believe that having broad knowledge as to subjects is critical. That is because, this reality not only leads to wide range of perspectives but also results in prosperity in job market.

In general, obtaining an excessive amount of information regarding academic areas is helpful. The most significant reason that should be taken into account is that it gives vast points of view to every person. As it is clear, for encountering various challenges in academic fields, issues should be seen from the entire facets and dimensions. In addition, merits and demerits of every solution have to be considered beside the consequences of it. On the other hand, these sorts of maneuvers cannot be achieved except with extensive knowledge regarding the faced challenges. For example, I have studied electrical engineering and two years ago I was a TA of my professor. Unlike the general public's standpoint, for being successful in this major, mathematics is not the only unit. A considerable amount of knowledge in physics filed is also essential. My background in the physics alongside the mathematics helped me to be prosperous in teaching position. The matter of this fact is that for solving one question, I used to prove all the physical theories and mathematical formulas entirely for students.

Another reason which deserves some words here is that the thriving in job market ensues from the comprehensive knowledge in terms of academic courses. Needless to say, with being knowledgeable in several fields, a variety of career opportunities can be provided for persons. As a result, they can find their favorite job readily. Furthermore, this fact conduces to strong resume of everyone and significant amount of reliance of managers to them. Eventually, these types of individuals can create their own profession after gaining varieties of experiences. For instance, when I entered into job environment, in addition to my own major's software, I had a little information as for other software and hardware of computers. This matter helped me to be perfect in my interview and got my boss's attention. Nowadays, owing to my knowledge in both electrical and computer engineering, I have extended my career easily.

All in all, whether the broad knowledge in many academic subjects is appropriate for general population has become huge concern among investigations. In this case, I assert that the widespread information is crucial due to plenty of reasons, two of which are suitable viewpoints and job positions for persons.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
... TA of my professor. Unlike the general publics standpoint, for being successful in thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ewpoints and job positions for persons.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in general, as a result, by and large, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29545454545 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02317494976 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552272727273 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9537144481 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.304347826 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1304347826 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126707080651 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364218925393 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498949672218 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096547899659 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560139318062 0.0645574589148 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.