There are certain considerations or factors which everyone can take into account to improve children’s responsibility. I certainly do not agree that controlling the financial resources by children is profitable. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The explanations go as follows.
Firstly, it can waste children time. These days, human experience a huge advancements and improvements in different fields of science and engineering including transportation, communication, health caring, and artificial intelligence. In this modern world, the main duty of the children is to keep the pace with this technical and practical progress, and therefore any time wasting cannot be acceptable. The task of money management would be time consuming and bring children’s attention away from learning or education, and so this can harm their future life and career.
Furthermore, psychology problem is another noticeable reason that comes to mind. Arranging and planning of money would be a very sophisticated and problematic duty. Sometimes, expert and dexterous people need to gather and offer a proper solution or interpretation. Because of this, the children feel stressed and pressured when they are forced to be liable for their money. This unwanted and critical situation or burden can change their attitude toward the life and prevent them from a healthy lifestyle and some daily activities.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by one who argues that the youngsters should have an opportunity to control their own money. Chiefly, it helps children to learn more and become responsible adults. In fact, the children ought to control and save their money for necessary things such as educational books or school tuition. After a while, they would learn this lesson that any money wasting can cause budget limitation. However, still I affirm that managing money by children is not effective way. Although there are some benefits, they can be neglected compared to the negative effects which money management by children has. Besides, children have a chance to pass business and marketing class in school and learn how to be financial responsible.
Due to aforementioned ground, all people should bear in mind that arranging and managing money by children would not be an ideal way. Participation of time and healthiness are two prime and conspicuous supports.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45430107527 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11216841848 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0555761773 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2272727273 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205436766546 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609102471123 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533479327755 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108446177853 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521711415505 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.