The issue of whether a group always need a leader or not has engendered copious controversies among people. Although a certain prediction cannot be made, in spite of all undeniable merits of the opposite ideas, I firmly concur with the idea that tour guide is so important that all groups should have one of it. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
The first exquisite point that should be mentioned is that a leader is necessary for a group in view of the fact that the group member can use their time more efficiently. For example, a person who know the impressing landscape of a region can easily guide other members to the region, and they do not have to spend their time to find these kind of places. The modern world offers abundant example of people who spend their time and money to take a trip to a tourism regions, but they do not find the route that take them to specific landscapes. To demonstrate most of the authorities contend that people should have tour guide if they want to travel. So they establish an experimental program to examine the effect of having tour guide on the satisfaction of people who travel. The results are surprising: over 90 percent of people who do not have tour guide complain about the problems that they had in finding the routs and striking landscape in tourism regions.
Apart from the fact mentioned above one should regard another subtle point meticulously that providing that a group has a leader, the members of the group are more confident. In fact, they can travel with more comfort and confidence in view of the fact that they have a person who have a lot of information about a region. Just imagine in a trip one of the group member encounter serious problem, in the event that they do not have a tour guide, they will not be able to handle situation. The noteworthy intelligible statistics reveal by a recent research conducted in our country show that people who travel in groups guiding by a tour guide have less problems compared to the groups which do not have tour guide.
Being aware of the problems which we may encounter in a trip is vital for us to have a safe satisfactory trip. Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that having a tour guide not only helps us to have a better use of time, but also helps us to handle problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...do not have to spend their time to find these kind of places. The modern world offers abun...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... in groups guiding by a tour guide have less problems compared to the groups which d...
^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., but also helps us to handle problems.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, apart from, for example, in fact, kind of, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59619952494 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57003613413 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472684085511 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1993464004 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0666666667 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125382002063 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498998350521 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327550191422 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777041573263 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388734616351 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.