We are living in a world of news. People believe that with the invention of technology they information they have about the world is greater than ever before. However, people also concern that whether in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. It is questionable issue because this depends on each person. Some people may like to read and watch different magazines or channels. Others would like to focus on only one news or channel. In my opinion, I love to have broad information from various resources. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, reading and watching to get information from diverse news resources will prevent the prejudice in our thinking and the way we see an event. We all acknowledge the speed of news is spread rapidly than ever before, and there are a thousand of ways to get information. Meanwhile, people have different perspectives about an incident. Some people may think this event negatively. Others may describe this in a positive way. They make the news more interesting. Therefore, when we get the information from different sources we can avoid our bias and see the happen with a subject eye.
Another reason is we can open our mind to many aspects. People say that two mind work better than one. When we read and collect information from various resources, these information will help us to enrich our knowledge. For example, if I do a research and I collect a plenty of information from many kinds of books, magazines and websites. From reading and watching more news resources, I will understand what I would like to write deeply and widely. Obviously, I will make my project more interesting and provide the readers with more ideas.
In conclusion, people have different ideas about the issue of whether in order to be well - informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. In my view, for two reasons, which I have just mentioned above, I agree with the statement that people should collect more resources because we can avoid our bias and open our mind to many perspectives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news resources. It is questionable issu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nt negatively. Others may describe this in a positive way. They make the news more interesting. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 564, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t sources we can avoid our bias and see the happen with a subject eye. Another reason is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...ect information from various resources, these information will help us to enrich our knowledge. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news resources. In my view, for two rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86920980926 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73772689844 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468664850136 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2723328423 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6956521739 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9565217391 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82608695652 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269410261933 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807701331392 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960488464482 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191608234757 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626620858672 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.