Not surprisingly, people harbor different perceptions toward the key factor of human-success. While some people have argued that taking risks has played a pivotal role in everyone's success, others believe that pursuing what any individual has expertise in it cause prosperity. Even though the former view can not be generalized to all cases, I tend to agree on it based on the following concerns.
The first point to support this is that success have a close tie in motivation and creativity. In fact, the empirical research and anecdotal evidence reveal that human's development and progress have stemmed from different challenging which people encounter with them in unfamiliar situations. In fact, taking risks under realized circumstance, have paved the way for not only transition progress, but also it causes excessive success as people's creativity burgeon through overcoming with novel obstacles.
Moreover, people always have phobia from unknowns. From psychological point of view, there has been a tendency for most people to stay in "comfort zone", a state which people have sense of secure. However, there is a perception that any individuals needs to take some risks during their life time in order to achieve their goals and leave their comfortable area. Christophe Coulomb, for example, might not be a successful explorer if he denied taking risks and entering to a new area. As a result, any effort which is ended up with prosperity is always accompanied with different risks.
On the other hand, the role of knowledge and experience should not be overlooked. The knowledge, at broad perspective, is regarded as an inevitable part of the progress. Conspicuously, having deep understanding about a topics allows educators not only broaden their horizon but also acquire a better perspective in professional issue. In addition, skills and experience gained through learning process help people to find their successful way through their life. As an example, a broker in stocks' market is required to have a broad knowledge about different subjects such as accounting, finance and enough empirical experience as well to precede from others' rival in changing environment.
In conclusion, there has been a positive correlation between trying new things and being successful. As it was mentioned, successful people need to flourish their creativity and audacity to overcome with their intrinsic fears and obstacles. Nonetheless, being expert in specific field can be known as a contributory factor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...arch and anecdotal evidence reveal that humans development and progress have stemmed f...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...s needs to take some risks during their life time in order to achieve their goals and lea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a topic' or simply 'topics'?
Suggestion: a topic; topics
...uously, having deep understanding about a topics allows educators not only broaden their...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264705882353 0.229887763892 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.174208144796 0.158761421928 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0882352941176 0.0866891130778 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0429864253394 0.046263068375 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0339366515837 0.0685040099705 50% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128959276018 0.118717715034 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0701357466063 0.0351676179071 199% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.00112529532 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027149321267 0.0309702414327 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00226244343891 0.00188951952338 120% => OK
Determiners: 0.0746606334842 0.0887237588012 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00904977375566 0.0209618222197 43% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0113122171946 0.0139019557991 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2527.0 2387.08602151 106% => OK
No of words: 393.0 408.028673835 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.43002544529 5.86048508987 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.41475826972 0.338922669872 122% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297709923664 0.251872472559 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.241730279898 0.174417080927 139% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.18320610687 0.112833075102 162% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00112529532 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580152671756 0.524397521467 111% => OK
Word variations: 68.4875874775 59.2087087015 116% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6842105263 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6920523353 48.84282405 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 120.699889404 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.947368421053 0.644075263715 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 50.4552028927 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.84684684685 1.45489161554 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217576650431 0.300154397459 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0818031853789 0.103427244359 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0586551246732 0.0752933317313 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.478556199122 0.497263757937 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.102364509731 0.151897553556 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792195085602 0.114077575197 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442034849583 0.0781384742642 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.243705316856 0.336927656856 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00569683857491 0.067059652881 8% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141632163946 0.210909579961 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02483465514 0.0618886996521 40% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8870967742 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.