In the given sets of materials, the main topic is whether buzzing, a strategy which products were highly regarded by the customers, had restricted based on its misleading concept or not. While the author has focused on its demerits, the speaker in the follow-up material cast doubt on them in a number of ways.
The first point mentioned in the article is that buzzers have been paid for their promotion. Hence, they might deceive customers by providing a spurious account. However, the lecturer stated that the company had recruited those consumers who were satisfied with their purchase. In fact, they have been paid for telling the truth about their pervious usage.
Moreover, according to the eassy, since buzzers were known as ordinary people, customers were less suspicious of their offering information compared to the controversial advertising. Nonetheless, this was questioned by the speaker as he argued that in this strategy people asked lots of different questions about the authenticity of buzzing's claim.
Last but not least, the writer has asserted that people's social circle might be impaired as they unconsciously became skeptical of the surrounding people. Nevertheless, according to the lecture, as buzzers spontaneously have been selected among trustful people, this assumption might not be true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople, customers were less suspicious of their offering information compared to t...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.21645021645 0.261695866417 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.207792207792 0.158904122519 131% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0692640692641 0.0723426182421 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.047619047619 0.0435111971325 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.047619047619 0.0277247811725 172% => OK
Prepositions: 0.151515151515 0.128828473217 118% => OK
Participles: 0.108225108225 0.0370669169778 292% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.82367420511 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.012987012987 0.0208969081088 62% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.108225108225 0.128158765124 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.012987012987 0.0158828679856 82% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00865800865801 0.0114777025283 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1324.0 1645.83664459 80% => OK
No of words: 206.0 271.125827815 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.42718446602 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04852973271 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.407766990291 0.374372842146 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.334951456311 0.287516216867 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.257281553398 0.187439937562 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.160194174757 0.113142543107 142% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82367420511 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645631067961 0.539623497131 120% => OK
Word variations: 67.5077812373 53.8517498576 125% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1627937275 49.3711431718 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.4 132.220823453 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 0.878197800319 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 54.0951456311 50.5018328374 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.57142857143 1.90840788429 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507313953097 0.549887131256 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0967190178595 0.142949733639 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0703803951115 0.0787303798458 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.648111505482 0.631733273073 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14991387583 0.139662658121 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223581424513 0.266732575781 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640313261115 0.103435571967 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.266630351095 0.414875509568 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0190221810414 0.0530846634433 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323564600128 0.40443939384 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161834212772 0.0528353158467 31% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 4.0 10.2958057395 39% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.