In the given sets of materials, the main topic is whether there has been a decline in the trend of reading literature documentaries or not. While the author has focused on those justifications to agree with such a view, the speaker in the follow-up material cast doubt on those points in number ways.
The first point mentioned in the article is that the anticlimax in reading books caused different demerits such as deterioration in imaginations or other intellectual stimulations. However, this was questioned by the lecturer as she stated that reading other forms of high-quality of educational materials also boost intellectual stimulation. So this assumption had some flaws.
Moreover, according to the essay cultural aspects might adversely affected due to declining in the rate of written readers. As matter of fact, they have spent excessive amount of time on others futile medias. Nonetheless, the speaker mentioned the cultural valued substances were not limited to written ones and conspicuously other forms of involvements in literature terms like listening to a masterpiece music could improve cultural evaluation.
Last but not least, the writer has acknowledged this point that dull eagerness of literature readers was the main culprit for lack of proper writer's support. Nevertheless, according to lecturer, some other reasons such as inability of authors to write comprehensive textbook were responsible for this trend.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'while', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269709543568 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.161825726141 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112033195021 0.0723426182421 155% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0414937759336 0.0435111971325 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00829875518672 0.0277247811725 30% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.153526970954 0.128828473217 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0788381742739 0.0370669169778 213% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.10994853462 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0290456431535 0.0208969081088 139% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.112033195021 0.128158765124 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00829875518672 0.0158828679856 52% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00414937759336 0.0114777025283 36% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1444.0 1645.83664459 88% => OK
No of words: 222.0 271.125827815 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.5045045045 6.08160592843 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.396396396396 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.328828828829 0.287516216867 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.238738738739 0.187439937562 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.189189189189 0.113142543107 167% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10994853462 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63963963964 0.539623497131 119% => OK
Word variations: 67.9870412573 53.8517498576 126% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 22.2 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8212311702 49.3711431718 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.4 132.220823453 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 0.878197800319 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 55.0828828829 50.5018328374 109% => OK
Elegance: 2.37254901961 1.90840788429 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.588380125342 0.549887131256 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0949132254245 0.142949733639 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0702450551054 0.0787303798458 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.612132167826 0.631733273073 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.168468576328 0.139662658121 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248364460119 0.266732575781 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121380992803 0.103435571967 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.277388656465 0.414875509568 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0409082282672 0.0530846634433 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385457382726 0.40443939384 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595094759016 0.0528353158467 113% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.62251655629 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.