There are different kinds of people with different mentalities. However, everyone has their own view. In my opinion, successful people take risks when compared to other people this is because they want to get reach their goals and to get happiness.
First, successful people try things differently to reach their goals with a good passion. Most of the people who get success starts with the failure. However, some people might get feared to do that a task because they think they might get a failure. For instance, my father and my uncle started a business in the rice mill. They need to trade and should check all the accounts daily. But, once the business was failed, so my father quit the business because of fear. But my uncle did that business by taking risks and finally, he became the richest person among my relatives.
Second, by doing the same thing daily one cannot gain knowledge. For instance, my sister gets bored to do the same task daily hence she always thinks different to try new things which give her a lot of enjoyment. And she even established a software company by herself as want to learn new things from that job. Initially, she used to a job as a developer. She did every role in the company as a tester, manager e.t.c.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that successful people try things differently to gain knowledge and happiness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1977.66487455 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 238.0 407.700716846 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75210084034 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47153486123 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 212.727598566 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 618.680645161 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1844640415 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8666666667 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200829890228 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676684585568 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487293042262 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122458466992 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152476512564 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.5 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 86.8835125448 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.