The reading and the lecture are both about the Torreya taxifoha trees. The article states that Torreya tree which is in the state of Florida is getting declined and the author considers three reasons to address the decline of Torreya. However, the lecturer explains that the information provided in reading is not satisfied, and refutes each of the author's points.
First, the article conveys that to plant the Torreya tree in the same location where it was grown for thousands of years and also contains a specific micro climate. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that reestablishment is an unlikely solution and says that the tree may be affected by the change of climate. Moreover, there is a chance of an increase in global warming. Furthermore, Florida has the wetland which may change to dry lands.
Second, the text explains that to move Torreya tree to a different place where the temperature is cooler. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this point by saying that in the past black lotus tree was moved to other location. This lotus plant was grown so fast and killed the other plants which are placed near this plant. Furthermore, the lecturer says that the other plants may be at serious risk.
Third, the article posits that to save the seed of Torreya in the research centers. However, the professor says that the large population of Torreya plants cannot resist the diseases. He mentions that research center cannot provide enough capacity for these plants to grow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...increase in global warming. Furthermore, Florida has the wetland which may change...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97244094488 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45236406926 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511811023622 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8921286351 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2142857143 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31625912557 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114524388941 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845216123171 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195536818022 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224755031385 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.