Occupations are fundamental to human's life because they provide people with a sense of fulfillment, productivity, and purpose. There is an emerging discussion about the key factors contribute to the success of one's job. It's accustomed to learning that individuals are frequently trapped in conflict with inner contradiction, thus it's reasonable that quite a few citizens endorse that the relationship with others is crucial in a future job. I, however, hold the counterargument that the success of future job depends on how hard you study in school instead. There are several reasons why I support this, which I will explore in the following essay.
What must be prioritized is that I have heeded that it's persuasive to lend credence to the view that studying hard will help you to have a better academic learning, by acquiring more knowledge and triggering interest, which benefits the choice of future job. To begin with, only through studying as hard as possible, can you acquire more knowledge. To further explain it, with more time and more energy engaged in study, you will be able to read a great number of books and communicate with your teacher, which considerably broaden your horizon; in contrast, if you are not studying hard, how you have more knowledge. Moreover, by studying hard, you will have more chance to locate your interest. Specifically, learning knowledge from various areas ensures you to have more choice about what you are interested; however, if you are not studying hard, you will not able to find your interest. Both knowledge and interest are vital for future job, because interest determines what kind of job you will take and knowledge helps you to better finish your work.
Another vehicle to my point of view is that studying hard is conducive to your personal development, by promoting time management ability and strengthening concentration.
Initially, studying hard will help you to learn how to manage your time. To be specific, when studying hard, you have to spend a large amount of time in all the subjects, which requires better time management ability to finish the tasks; on the contrary, if you spend little time in study, you will not need to face this problem. Furthermore, your concentration will be largely strengthened through studying hard. In detail, according to research done by Harvard university, when one focuses on study more than six hours every day, his concentration will be efficiently promoted; on the other hand, one will feel hard to focus on one thing if he doesn't study hard. There is little doubt that time management ability and concentration are necessarily needed in a future job.
To sum up, it's not easy to tell whether my position outweighs the others', given the complex situation described above. However, after weighty consideration, I insist that studying hard puts future job as beneficiary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ey factors contribute to the success of ones job. Its accustomed to learning that in...
^^^^
Line 6, column 647, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...l feel hard to focus on one thing if he doesnt study hard. There is little doubt that ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2411.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09725158562 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84634599466 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492600422833 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0661239525 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.894736842 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8947368421 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303392593543 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113702020476 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490151104323 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160612651767 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653649794668 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.