In my idea, teachers should not represent their social or political attitudes in the classroom.
This has many important reasons which make this idea.
First, many students like their teachers and respect for them. So they accept their opinions without thinking more and they think that teachers are true always. In addition, students learned to obey teacher statements. As a result, students accept teachers ideas as a rule and they do not have the opportunity to discuss the subject.
Second, if teachers discuss their opinions in classrooms students who do not agree with that may get a bad feeling
about their teacher. because of that, they may do not participate in classes, study courses or do their homework.
Third, teachers in classes just mention their opinion and do not discuss it with students, Also students generally know less than teacher about social and political subjects. At this position, teachers may exaggerate about their attitudes
and do not speak fairly.
As a conclusion, this is not helpful that teachers mention their view of social and political subjects and it is better
to discuss fairly in some limited subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...get a bad feeling about their teacher. because of that, they may do not participate in...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and political subjects and it is better to discuss fairly in some limited subjec...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, third, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 52.1666666667 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 1977.66487455 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 187.0 407.700716846 46% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1871657754 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 4.48103885553 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53643979587 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 212.727598566 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 618.680645161 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0906976738 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1818181818 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.53405017921 198% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276186505121 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121408140174 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601314365642 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128548570743 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703903168761 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 86.8835125448 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.