Nowadays, the development of technology proceeds with any kind of concerns likewise, social and political concerns. Where ever you go, you can see a group of people talking about society or politics. In this regard, people are having a controversy about this issue, whether the teachers should make their social or political views known to students in the classroom or not. I am personally against this idea and believe that the classroom is not the appropriate place for this kind of debates. I cling to my viewpoint for three reasons and will illustrate them in the following.
The first aspect to point out is, in the school policy, there is a definition for the classroom, either the teachers or students should follow the rules. To be more clear, a classroom is a place in which, the teacher should try to learn science and manner to the students. On the other hand, students should make effort to pay attention to the teachers and treat them with respect and try to participate in the teaching process. It is a definition of the classroom that strongly in contrasts with unrelated topics such as social or political deliberations. To clarify my point, take a high school class as an example, in such class the teacher is expected to teach mathematics, biology, physics and of course teach the students how to relate well with others.
Apart from the point made above, the deliberations about social and political issues take a lot of time. When they are started, nobody can anticipate the end of the debate, so if they occur in a classroom, it would be a waste of time which, is supposed to be a time in which students learn new facts.
In addition to the points stated above, students are in a critical period of their life due to they are teenagers. They should be given the opportunity to choose their own decisions and path. If a teacher constantly speaks about his beliefs in the classroom, it will influence the students' perspective. Let me take myself as an example, when I was in high school, I had a teacher who always stated his beliefs about politic in the classroom. It influenced me and as a result, I vote wrong in the elections.
All in all, according to forementioned points and examples, I assert the idea that it is wrong when a teacher states his social or political views in the classroom. Although there may be different points of view, I think in order to have a more efficient educational system, it is better to avoid entering personal beliefs in the teaching process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
...development of technology proceeds with many kind of concerns likewise, social and politi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, may, so, well, apart from, i think, in addition, kind of, such as, talking about, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79487179487 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73989666936 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503496503497 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6050445876 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.263157895 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256543685668 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800244231948 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545748895318 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135672655435 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597053389394 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.