Nowadays, the advent of technology provides a complex and problematic environment for modern society. Every person is surrounded with different choices and challenges. These days time become the most precious element in everybody's life. Nobody is willing to squander the time he has been given. In this regard, a controversy raised amongst people that whether to dedicate a lot of time to make sure that everything is correct with their work or to work quickly and risk making mistakes. I am personally in favor of the first approach. I cling to my viewpoint for two reasons and will illustrate them in the following.
The first aspect to be mentioned is when one tries to be more concentrated on his work and makes sure about the occurrence of every step that he takes, eventually it takes less time. On the other hand, when a person wants to work rapidly and does not care about the mistakes he made, in the end, he has to return and starts his work all over again, that leads to the additional amount of time. To clarify my point, take the process of making a cake as an example. When one tries to be specific and follows the instruction of how to bake a cake step by step, can bake a delicious cake but is one tries to bake a cake quickly without taking the instruction as a guide, he may eventually be left by a horrible result and need to do the process again which, takes more time. As a result, being organized and careful about mistakes leads to a better result in less time which, means the person does a more efficient work when he makes sure everything is correct from the beginning.
Apart from the point discussed above, when you work slowly and try to make sure everything is correct, you have a good feeling inside you. To be more clear, a person who, does the things with the patient and correctly has less stress than a person who is harried about the process. the second person just thinks about the result and not only enjoys the process of his work but also endures a lot of pressure and stress, because deep down he knows his work is not worthy according to so many mistakes that it included. Let take my self as an example, when I was working on my thesis, I tried to do everything correctly and progress step by step, that actually led to a great outcome, while my other classmate tried to rash and he did not achieve a good result.
All in all, based on the foregoing points and examples, I believe it is better to be patient and exact with our works, according to the fact that it certainly leads to a better outcome, but if one tries to work fast and ignore the mistake, the result will not be promising.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...erson who is harried about the process. the second person just thinks about the res...
^^^
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ignore the mistake, the result will not be promising.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, second, so, while, apart from, as to, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44421487603 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42948060973 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469008264463 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.8323909861 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.529411765 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4705882353 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242720166277 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080849801843 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808564500513 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145856753153 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620401245371 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.