TPO 22 Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Choosing the right topic for the classroom has always been a big concern for teachers. As everybody knows, teachers try to make regular communication with their students. Consequently, they talk about many topics in their classrooms to create a strong relationship with their students. Some of them prefer to talk about some general topics and some of them prefer to have a speech about other concepts. In my view, they do not need to talk about their own ideas. I will substantiate my point of view in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, students would be influenced by their teacher. Teachers are getting paid because of the content that they teach to the students, not by discussing various life issues. In the classes, both teachers and students should focus on lectures and related problems. Teachers should discuss the lectures with the students, share their research or working experiences instead of talking about their political viewpoints. It definitely will increase studying efficiency in the classes. For example, my friend's math teacher talked about the recent political news during the lesson with some of the students. As a result, he totally forgot about teaching, and one lesson ended up like that with no productivity of the child.
Last but not least, when teachers make their social or political perspectives known to students, they may influence students' viewpoints. As a matter of fact, political or social discussions distract the student's focus. This really influences the opinions of students, especially when their teachers' opinions are biased. Additionally, this also prevents the free development of students. For instance, when my teacher usually expresses his disapproval about government, he makes us have the same opinions as him. Hence, most of the students, which don't know much about politics, at the class consider policies and agreements of the president are wrong or unsuitable. Obviously, the attitudes of teachers have the potential to change the viewpoints of students.
All in all, Teachers play a vital role in society, since they have an indirect effect on the student's thoughts. Political and social issues that are discussed by the teachers not only waste most of the valuable time of the classrooms but also will influence the students' grades and most probably future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 595, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t political news during the lesson with some of the students. As a result, he totally forgo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat with no productivity of the child. Last but not least, when teachers make t...
^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...him. Hence, most of the students, which dont know much about politics, at the class ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, really, so, for example, for instance, talking about, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26612903226 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7726341266 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2926232119 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0454545455 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323657148402 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988997779218 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860011263971 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195226896785 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281359327325 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.