The velocity of life has increased a lot during the past century. Consequently, It is important to keep up with this changes for gaining significant success. That’s why, I daresay that working quickly is more valuable skill nowadays then making everything correct. I will provide some example to support my point of view.
First of all, by using specific tools we can save time and prevent ourselves from making simple mistakes. An obvious example of that is computer technologies which are able to proofread a writing material. Likewise, computers can correct mistakes vary fast and provide more suitable word constractions. This reliable tools is using not only by writers and journalists but also by programmers and software developers, which are able to proofread their computer code by using wonderful correcting programms. In the light of above, I eager to say that computers nowadays are significantly change our life provided us with ability to concentrate on the more important tasks.
Secondly, taking risks sometimes is better decision than trying to make everything correctly, when we are talking about saving time. Just to mention ambulence nurses which must make quick and highly important decisions for saving people’s life. However, this decisions may be mistaken and wrong in some ways, for example, during a first aid such as a heart massage they can brake some person’s ribs. But in this case quick movements and thinking are more valuable for patient’s health then bange of broken ribs. That’s why their reactive thinking can possibly save a lot of people’s life
To wrap up, I want to emphasize the importance of being reactive and quick in the existing reality. Because of the fast rate of our life we should be adapted for the reality by making our decision quicker and trying as much as we can to minimize the number of fails.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...uently, It is important to keep up with this changes for gaining significant success...
^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'changed'.
Suggestion: changed
...at computers nowadays are significantly change our life provided us with ability to co...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...That's why their reactive thinking can possibly save a lot of people's life To ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, such as, talking about, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15635179153 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83520130764 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589576547231 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7065942028 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.533333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203400749545 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697987810358 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633392116355 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120069672225 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417414452139 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.