From past to present, as times go people try to do their works faster. Many instruments
like cars, airplanes, trains and computers increase this tendency in humans and help him to go faster and faster. In this condition, people just have short aims and they really do not think about the main goals of their work. this may mislead people and cause more mistakes. If people work slow, they can think more about their way so they will be more confident about their results. Furthermore, working slowly can increase peace feeling so people will have a better sense of their work and in large scale their life. Also, it is assumed that if we do our work quickly we will have more time but generally it is in a diverse direction. As works are done quickly, they will have more errors and it will be very time-consuming
to correct it. Moreover, on many occasions, the mistakes can not be compensated and it will have financial detriment too. Working slowly will have better results and more successes and as a result, people will face less problem and anxiety and they will enjoy their life. On the other hand, working quickly may make people experience a lot of situations but their overall knowledge and experience in every situation will be less and in some cases, it can not be helpful.
To sum up, although working quickly can have more excitement and put people in more situations but working slowly will have better results, less anxiety, more peaceful feeling and more success and generally people in this situation will enjoy more from their life.
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 70
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 66
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 73
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ink about the main goals of their work. this may mislead people and cause more mista...
^^^^
Line 2, column 726, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rrors and it will be very time-consuming to correct it. Moreover, on many occasio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, really, so, as a result, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 271.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74907749077 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36103544336 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 212.727598566 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476014760148 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.36521304 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150316239745 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07141177684 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361104696746 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108713776916 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022947524484 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.