Working is one of the primary parts of every body’s life. It has a close relationship with the spirit of people and their feeling and satisfaction with life. On the other hand, this issue is so crucial for managers because they always seek the best way to improve the efficiency of tasks. Some people think that doing the similar tasks is more marvelous and it can enhance the efficiency of workers. However, this issue has recently engendered many controversies among the psychologists. While some are adamantly claiming that repetitive works are boring, many may take the opposite viewpoint. Nevertheless, many factors should be taken into consideration to be able to prove which belief is closer to reality. As far as I’m concerned, I firmly contend that working on different tasks can satisfy workers more. The following paragraphs will aptly elucidate my perspective through three outstanding reasons.
The first noteworthy point to be mentioned in this context is that doing diverse tasks makes people be more energetic. Certainly, some people would presume if they do repetitive works, it’s easier for them and overall they would save more time. However, scientists claim that repetitive works have a negative effect on our mind and it losses energy during that. To clarify this, I shall take a personal experience as an example. In the third year of university, I should pass my training course in a company. I went to an institute that was about the wind turbine. There, I have to do repetitive works and that was so boring for me. I wished that time passes and it finishes. Also, I don’t have any promotion to find a new way of doing works and can’t use my innovation power.
Equally important is that doing diverse works has a close relationship with personal experiences and abilities/. It’s completely accepted by all the people that various works can make us be more professional. Furthermore, if we learn different tasks, we have a chance to enhance our position and also maybe we are able to change our work with the better one. Therefore, the ability to experiencing different tasks is not only essential but crucial. A recent study in Japan shows that people who have diverse work in their jobs are more professional and risky in experiencing new jobs. So, different tasks have different ideas and agility for us.
Furthermore, it is an indisputable fact that people who can do diverse works feel more beneficial than another one. It’s obvious that if they can use their experiences for solving problems they would have more motivation for doing the job. In other words, they have multidirectional characteristics. For instance, one of my friends works at an architect company and she experiences many various tasks in her job. Whenever we meet each other, she defines an attractive task that she does and she feels very good because she is able to handle different works.
In brief, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that ability to doing diverse works is much better than handling with the same task every day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 563, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...iming that repetitive works are boring, many may take the opposite viewpoint. Neverthele...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... can't use my innovation power. Equally important is that doing diverse works h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, third, while, for instance, in brief, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 514.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03696498054 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83906806875 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509727626459 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7053119081 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96666666667 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251304798529 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685920050748 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639715059736 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165042461064 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226587388361 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.