The reading passage debates an important topic about strict rules for generating coal ash. The author acclaims that excessive strict rules are unessential and it would have negative effects and gives three reasons of support for the assertion. Nevertheless, the professor clarifies that none of the reasons given by the writer is cogent.
First, the article discusses that there are enough rules. For example, the government forces companies to use liner materials to prevent coal ash to penetrate in the soil. Even though, the professor contends that this rule is for new lands and old lands would damage the environment. According to the professor statements, a compliant rule should exist that prohibited damages from old and new lands. Consequently, this reason is not convincing.
Second, the professor opposes the writer’s assertion about concerns of recycling coal ash. The article asserts that if people figure out the strict rules about coal ash, they wouldn’t use it in customary applications such as building anymore because they think it has many bad for their health. The professor rejects this idea by giving an example of mercury. She argues that everyone knows that mercury is poisonous but it leads to recycling it in secure way ad it has much application after recycling.
Finally, the passage posits that extra regulations would lead to more cost for the power generation and ultimately it would increase the electricity cost which is not pleasant for people. The professor deputes this claim by mentioning that it will increase the cost for the company about 50 billion dollars but it just increase bill as one percent which is not considerable. So we can infer that it’s very little besides environmental importance.
To sum up, the article and the professor have conflicting ideas about extra regulation in generating coal ash and all of the reasons support that many strict rules have to exist to prohibit soil and water damages and protect the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 115, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...a regulation in generating coal ash and all of the reasons support that many strict rules ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2298136646 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75659563411 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555900621118 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7920245196 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39625190354 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120813389961 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109855206813 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215126168549 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256052689222 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.