Now-a-days, this topic is hotly debated by the huge amount of the audience and obviously, it should be because, it is major concern for the living era. However, people of this century, may be get started their creativity level upto the mark and entrapping their selves really honestly in a working fields. Yes! I immensely suggests and support the way that, working slowly and looking every aspect of it, is more meaningful for the new generation. In fact, I also relate my self to it and there are plentiful reasons for holding this statement, such as: work efficiently, achieve a experience and learning more and more from this.
To begin up with my reason, the persons ability shows somehow the effort of the particular work are going either well or turn drastically. By this, you are not concerning the other people, in turn, they will observe you and by working in a calm way you are admiring them to make you ideal.
Furthermore, the obtaining the more adventurous experience is actually beneficial for your self, by counting the mistakes by holding patience and cover up the whole scenario in a peaceful environment, comparative working in the harsh and speedy circumstances. For instance, my boss always expect from me to improve myself among the department staff and on a regular basis, he appreciates my work and suggest me to get more involvement to experience more level of working.
Last, but not the least, learning never ends up on the specific subject, by the age of the time, you are preparing more to face the new styles of teaching according the especial cases. Hence, learn the way, in which you are cool and calm and making neither mistakes nor taking the risks.
To conclude, sometimes it is must for you to work fast and finish the tasks under minimum time, and by this, might be you would face many loses too, but it is the experiences and that is why, I simply against this method of working. Thus, there are many advantages by working this pattern of work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'suggest'
...y in a working fields. Yes! I immensely suggests and support the way that, working slowl...
Line 1, column 581, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...ent, such as: work efficiently, achieve a experience and learning more and more f...
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...s. To begin up with my reason, the persons ability shows somehow the effort of the...
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... well or turn drastically. By this, you are not concerning the other people, in turn, they will ob...
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER
Message: Consider replacing "in a calm way" with adverb for "calm"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n, they will observe you and by working in a calm way you are admiring them to make you ideal...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, honestly, however, if, look, may, really, so, thus, well, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77167630058 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59713401311 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.734028668 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.583333333 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.45110844103 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207278182338 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815449226658 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388140922885 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117574602064 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276838238809 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.