Nowadays, modern technology becomes more and more convenient, so people begin to adjust their life style to make them work efficiently. This raise the question of whether it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct in today's world. I take the position that it is more important to work precisely and make sure that everything is flawless.
To begin with, working slowly but making sure that evertthing is correct is more efficient way to work, because the work is complete and can be used. For example, I cooperated with my friends to finish one final paper. Although I spended much time in searching for detailed data in the beginning, when I combined the data to a complete article, I was certain that every information is precise. However, my friend read the papers very quickly and spend less time in digesting them. Therefore, his part can not be used eventually, and both of us should paid extra attention to rewrite the final paper. As a result, it is important to make something correct at once. If we only care about speed and neglect accuracy, we would spent extra time in revising. This is not effcient at all.
Additionally, nowadays computer can take place people and help people finish numerous jobs, so speed is not important at all with computer's helps. For example, computer can help scientists count some difficult problems, so it is critiicle for scientists to write some formulas correctly. Through computer's aids, scientist do not have to burn the midnight oil just for counting, so modern scientists are responsible for do every job precisely. As a result, if people nowadays only focus on speed and have high risk of making mistakes, thay would not complish anything.
To sum up, working slowly but making sure that evertthing is correct not only is more effective but also can save time to revise. Besides, because modern people have the assistants from computer, speed is no longer important at all. Thus, I actually believe that it is more important to work precisely and make sure that everything is flawless than work quickly and risk making mistakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
... make them work efficiently. This raise the question of whether it is more important to work quickly an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...ut speed and neglect accuracy, we would spent extra time in revising. This is not eff...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90735694823 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60173612777 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49591280654 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0705281874 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.055555556 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348542293999 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121708679107 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147820633009 0.0737576698707 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248689385015 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146324279089 0.0645574589148 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.