The author of the reading passage and the professor both discuss the ethanol fuel. The author expresses that ethanol fuel is not a good replacement for gasoline. However, the professor discords with the idea mentioned in the reading passage. The professor offers several reasons to oppose the arguments in the article.
The author states that the use of ethanol fuel wold cause global warming as well. Nevertheless, the professor mentions that ethanol fuel is produced from plants, and growing plants can remove carbon dioxide. Therefore, the professor actually believes that the use of ethanol fuel can prevent global warming.
Second, the author claims that the use of ethanol fuel would reduce the amount of plants, and some animals would lost their food resources. The professor argues that we can use some parts of plants that are able to eat to produce ethanol fuel. As a result, the use of ethanol fuel would do harm to other spices.
Finally, although the author of the article indicates that ethanol fuel cost much than gasoline, the professor points out that the price of ethanol fuel will drop if we increase its production. Thus, the professor contends that the more ethanol fuel is available the lower the price is.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...mount of plants, and some animals would lost their food resources. The professor arg...
^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r contends that the more ethanol fuel is available the lower the price is.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00975609756 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3745828401 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2907300399 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5833333333 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432688299442 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199570698491 0.0996497079465 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919032483801 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2953816723 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725932399146 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.