The author of the reading passage and the professor both discuss genetic modification. The author expresses that planting genetic modified trees brings a large number of benefits. However, the professor discords with the idea mentioned in the reading passage. The professor offers several reasons to oppose the argument of this article.
First of all, although in the article the author claims that genetic modified trees are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts, the professor argues that genetic modified trees are only designed to resistant to one condition. When they faced various threats, because of their uniformity, they will be wiped out. Therefore, the professor actually believes that genetic modified trees are not likely to survive.
Second, even though the author states that genetic modified trees are able to bring a lot of economic benefits to the farmer, the professor mentions that the genetic modified trees cost more money than unmodified trees. Every time, farmers who want to grow genetic modified trees have to pay much to the company for the seeds. Thus, the professor can conclude that tree farmers can not get high returns form genetic modified trees.
Finally, while the author of the article indicates that growing genetic modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees, the professor points out that genetic modified trees are more aggressive than nature trees. As a result, genetic modified trees will compete other plants for resources. The professor contend that the use of genetic modified trees can not save the endangered native trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... planting genetic modified trees brings a large number of benefits. However, the professor discor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'contends'.
Suggestion: contends
...her plants for resources. The professor contend that the use of genetic modified trees ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37698412698 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49250261524 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1891961995 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.230769231 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560185421922 0.272083759551 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.250319266033 0.0996497079465 251% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145585403674 0.0662205650399 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.392690430738 0.162205337803 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128866565807 0.0443174109184 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.