The high pace of changes is one of the conspicuous aspects of the modern era especially in technology and science. There are many controversial arguments about the trade-off between velocity and accuracy (precision). Some people believe that we should do works quickly, even this speed increase the probability of making mistakes. I disagree with this statement and from my perspective, we should do our work with a calculated precision. The ensuing paragraphs will elaborate my points of view.
First exquisite point to be mentioned is that some mistakes have adverse effect on people’s lives. In better words, some mistakes might hurt people and these damages cannot be compensated anyway. Take Boeing company as example, these days one model of its' airplanes has some serious problems and two number of this model airplanes crashed in a short time in different places and about three hundred people were killed. After some month for finding the plane problem, Boeing provides a report and they told that there is a problem in plane's body near the wing. Therefore, for a careless mistake, three hundreds of people died and nobody can do anything for spouses, children, parents and friends of the victims. In result, some mistakes are fatal and they have bitter consequences.
The second point that comes to my mind is that some mistakes cause repetition. In other words, sometimes we do some works quickly for saving time, but some mistakes force us to spend more time for doing again that work and correcting our mistakes. For instance, my friend and I began to do our thesis at the same time. She just attached much importance to finish her thesis as soon as possible, while I pondered over each issue and question. Finally, she wrote whole of her thesis and she presented her thesis on the judging day. Some referees -professors who judges thesis- found some basic problems in her work and they coerced her to reform these basic problems. Finally, she was successful to finish her thesis two months later than me. Hence, sometimes doing works quickly not only is not time efficient but also is time wasting.
The last but not least, these days there is an intensive competition among producers to present their cutting-edge products earlier than their rivals. Since, they want to increase their sales and acquire more market share. Although, this strategy is so useful (beneficial), there are many cases that a mistake damages the company reputation and the company sale plunges awfully. For example, when Samsung supplied its' new high tech cell phone few years ago, the sale of cell phone was great and people bought millions of, but after two weeks some problems of the new cell phone became clear, there was a problem in battery and it exploded suddenly. All the media reported this mistake and nobody else buy this cell phone. In result, doing works quickly has several advantages, but a simple mistake can eliminate all those benefits.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned paragraphs, some mistakes are so important and we cannot ignore these problems just for being quick.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...troversial arguments about the trade-off between velocity and accuracy precision....
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Boeing) must be used with a third-person verb: 'companies'.
Suggestion: companies
...nnot be compensated anyway. Take Boeing company as example, these days one model of its...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'three hundred'.
Suggestion: three hundred
...ing. Therefore, for a careless mistake, three hundreds of people died and nobody can do anything ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 700, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[4]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'buys'.
Suggestion: buys
...a reported this mistake and nobody else buy this cell phone. In result, doing works...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, finally, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2600.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04854368932 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53936191602 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535922330097 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2897443386 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8076923077 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.85842293907 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124963310476 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365655717752 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043503991818 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720174626763 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302462775313 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.