The passage and lecture are raguing over the author of Voynich manuscript. The passage author suggests three persons that one of them might write the book. On the contrary, the lecturer challenges each person as author of the book and he believes that none of these people were the author of manuscript.
Firstly, the passage author proposes that Anthony Acham was the author of manuscript for some reasons. In contrast, the lecturer refuses this claim and he states that it is not fair, Acham as an ordinary physician scientist wrote thoes secret things. Moreover, the Acham books about the plants, was a book with some information about common well known plant and had nothing to do with secrets. Therefore, he did not write the manuscript.
Second, the author mantains that the manuscript is a fake book written by Edward Kelly. On the opposite side, the professor rebuts this claim and he states that Kelly was a person who trick poeple but he could do more easily to make fool people and earned money. In better words, this manuscript was written carefully while Kelly were capable to make fool people with simpler book. Hence, it was not necessary, he spent a lot of time for writing such a precise manuscript.
Third, the passage author notes that it is likey that Voynich himself wrote this book to sell it. On the other hand, the professor objects this point and he asserts that experiment have shown that the page and ink of manuscript are 400 years old. In this respect, Voynich might used some old books for making this manuscript, but it is imposible he could find such old ink to write the manuscript.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d such old ink to write the manuscript.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, while, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78291814947 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34105824171 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505338078292 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4146331878 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209531359455 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934698368974 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547459275976 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139127980555 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023918356983 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.